A nation is a body of people, inhabiting a definite territory, share common features such as race, language, a common history, religion, etc. and a common will which leads them to desire a common state.
‘Nationality’
is the distinctive quality of a group which has a common origin and tradition.
The group shares common characteristics and most of all possesses a will to
live together as a sovereign group. Therefore when a nationality of people
assert their political right to widen – or political determination, they form a
nation state.
Thus the feeling of ‘nationalism’ is a subjective one where in the people feel connected to each other because of shared characteristics – it is a sentiment, a consciousness created/nurtured by political, economic, social, intellectual, cultural factors.
Thus in the 18th and 19th century most states were formed on the basis of nationality – groups that shared a common language, religion, etc. formed a nation – state. (Unification of Germany = German speaking; Netherlands = rel.)
Thus the following elements usually constitute the formation of a nation.
(1) GEOGRAPHICAL UNITY
According
to Hertz and Barker, geographical unity leads to the formation of a nation.
Thus islands for example are more likely to be nation states.
Eg.
Australia, Sri Lanka
But
geographical unity is not necessary. Eg. The Jews considered themselves a
nation for 100’s of years though they possessed a geographical state only after
1948.
(2) UNITY OF LANGUAGE
Since
language is used for expression and communication, a common language helps to
promote nation. Ramsay Muir considers language the most important element of a
nation.
But
nations like India, UK, Switzerland have several languages.
(3) RACE
Political
determination on the basis of race was very important in the 19th
and 20th century. Thus Zummerman, Bryce, Burgess consider it a very
important element. It influenced the formation of Poland (1919), Israel.
Today
few states are really ‘racially pure’ and hence race is considered less
important.
(4) RELIGION
A
shared religion indicates not just a shared form of worship but also influences
philosophy and determines culture. Hence religion can be a very powerful
building force. The creation of Pakistan
was completely dependent on religion.
Today,
though most states are religiously heterogeneous, religious conflicts and
separatist movements on the basis of religion often surfaces.
(5) SHARED HISTORY
A
common past, particularly a traumatic one often leads to the development of
nationality or a feeling of oneness. Eg. The common anti-British feeling that
resulted from colonization brought Indians together to fight for a separate
independent state.
According to
Hertz, none of these elements are necessarily determinants of nationalism.
According to him (1) People should have desire to be one nation
(2)
People should endeavour for unity and strength.
NATIONALITY
STATEHOOD
-
Subjective - objective
-
psychological
- political / legal cond.
-
cond. of
mind
- cond. of law
-
can only
be encouraged not forced - enforceable
obligation
Nationalism
carried too far can be dangerous. It can lead to an exclusive policy – where
only those seen as being of ‘pure’ nationality should be members of the state.
Extreme nationalism (like Fascism) can elevate the concept of nation at the
cost of its people.
Vladimir
Solovyer – “In its extreme form it destroys a nation, for it makes it the enemy
of mankind…”
Nationalism
when expressed as a single religion/ pure raceetc. Always leads to conflict.
Nationalism
also encouraged minorities to demand separate states (sessation)
SYMBOLS OF
NATIONALISM
Snyder – “Nationalism is not innate instinct but rather a socially conditioned, synthetic sentiment.” Therefore it requires symbols.
Slogans, songs, flags, uniform, emblems, parades.
A NATIONAL CHARACTER – does it exist?
An outsider’s notion of the people of another nation. Greek writers considered the citizens of Sparta to be disciplined – can one really affix characteristics to a nation?
McDougall – Each national group has its own genius and its character is conditioned by geographical peculiarities, religion, etc. He says every race has inherent mental abilities which are permanent and influence its national character. English – reserved; Italians – gregarious; Indians – fatalist. Does that mean that one cannot find reserved Indians or gregarious Englishmen?
Given today’s multiethnic states, it is rather difficult to ascribe a particular trait to a nation. Also every nation changes with its history and therefore its character is also dynamic. Thus is national character only a stereotype?
No comments:
Post a Comment