Monday, 19 August 2019
COMMUNALISM (INDIA)
Wednesday, 22 June 2022
WAS THE PARTITION OF INDIA INEVITABLE AND UNAVOIDABLE?
The answer to this question differs widely with the nationality of the writer- Indian, Pakistani or British.
In India the partition of the country is considered a
tragedy. It is projected as the logical culmination of the long-standing British
policy of Divide and Rule and the Muslim League’s ideology of communalism and separateness.
The two worked together and forced the Indian National Congress to agree to the
partition of India. Indian writers largely place the blame at the door of the
Congress leaders and agree that if they had shown adequate understanding, tact
and boldness, the partition of the Motherland could be avoided.
In Pakistan however, the partition is considered as quite
logical and inevitable, and the growth of Muslim nationalism is traced in the depth
of Indian History.
Among the British scholars there is no unanimity of opinion
about the rationale of the partition of India and there is difference of opinion
among historians and those writers who served the ‘raj’ in India.
Whatever the verdict of history, credit must be given to
Mr. M. A. Jinnah for his adroit handling of the situation. He was a very shrewd
politician and often dodged his political rivals by clever somersaults. He rose
form strength to strength and earned the epithet of Qaid-i-Azam (Great
Organizer).
Jawaharlal Nehru attributes the growth of Muslim
communalism to the delay in the growth of a strong Muslim middle calss; this
enabled the League to work up the psychology of fear among the emotionally
excitable Muslim masses. The cry of ‘Islam in danger’ brought the Muslim masses
under the banner of the League and Mr. Jinnah stood forth as the political
messiah. All said, the acts of omission and commission on the part of the Hindu
Mahasabha further fanned the fanaticism of the Muslim League.
Mr. V. D. Savarkar, the President of Mahasabha, advocated ‘a
uncompromising doctrine of Hindu ascendency’ and openly announced that ‘the only
way to deal with the Hindu-Muslim schism was to insist that all India was Hindustan
and that the Muslims must reconcile themselves to the status of a minority community
in a democratic state which orders life by majority rule.
Sunday, 29 November 2020
INTERGROUP CONFLICTS
Def: A group is ‘a number of people who share some common characteristics’.
Characteristics of groups
A feeling of unity among members is essential to form a
group. The members of a group treat each other as their own and a sense of fellowship
between them develops naturally.
A sense of ‘we’ feeling among members develops among
members of a group, whereby they help each other and defend themselves
collectively against harmful elements. They treat others as outsiders.
A group is characterized by common ideals, interests and
values of life, shared by its members and this similarity or commonness
promotes unity among them.
A group is marked by the similarity of behavior of its
members. Each group has certain customs, social norms and procedures that are
acceptable to its members. Members violating them are punished. Thus, group has
control over actions of its members.
Some suggestions to minimize Intergroup conflict
Intergroup conflicts lead to serious social and political
disorders threatening even the vital interests of the nation. Therefore, every
citizen of India must find ways and means to resolve such conflicts.
Social thinkers have suggested three methods
Cooption – To coopt means to add. If two groups do not
agree on a certain issue, members of the dissenting group are absorbed in the
dominant group through what is called as cooption. When the dissenting members
get an opportunity to express their views and understand the other groups point
of view, it is comparatively easy to resolve the conflict.
Accommodation – means willing to oblige the other or
readiness to listen to the other’s points of view and to accept the solution if
found satisfactory. Conflicting parties can resolve their conflicts by
accommodation each other’s demands, views and claims.
Cooperation – is the basis of social life. Since no one is
totally self-sufficient, one has to seek the help of others to achieve ones
goals and satisfy ones needs. Human beings cooperated with each other to
achieve common and diverse goals. Cooperation helps to achieve our objectives
more effectively and efficiently by working together. It creates positive human
relations and bonds of interdependence between the cooperating parties. By
cooperating with each other we also derive social and psychological benefits
such as feeling of security.
The forces of communalism, casteism, linguism and
regionalism have been thwarting progress in the direction of building a strong
and prosperous India based on ideals of democracy, secularism, social and
economic justice. These forces can be overcome only by inculcating in Indian
people faith in the ideals of national unity, secularism, equality, or more
balanced economic policy.
Friday, 24 September 2021
PRINCIPLES BEHIND FORMING OF STATES | STATES REORGANIZING COMMISSION | INDIA
PRINCIPLES BEHIND FORMING THE STATES ON LINGUISTIC GROUNDS: STATES REORGANISATION COMMISSION
A special commission was appointed by the Government of India in 1953 to explore the feasibility of making the linguistic factor the main criterion in re-demarcating state boundaries. (Provincial boundaries of British India had been drawn either by historical accident or for reasons of administrative convenience). The Congress recognized the federal realities of Indian civilization in which, as the SRC Report of 1956 puts as, ‘linguistic homogeneity – reflects the social and cultural pattern of living, obtaining in well-defined regions of the country’.
The imperative of national unity however came to the forefront in the post – Partition trauma of independent India, and Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru feared a chain reaction of secession. Reluctantly, he asked the SRC to tackle question of linguistic communities, which coincided with regional diversities.
The SRC’s recommendations were made according to certain governing principles: to preserve and strengthen the unity of India; to keep in mind administrative, economic and financial considerations as in the implementation of five year plans; and to pay attention to cultural linguistic homogeneity as reflected in democratic and popular movements.
The SRC published its report and recommendations in 1955 and a States Reorganization Act followed in 1956. The boundaries of states in Southern India were redrawn in closer conformity with traditional linguistic regions, and eight major language groups got separate states immediately: Assamese – Assam, Bengali – West Bengal, Kannada – Karnataka, Kashmiri – Jammu and Kashmir, Malayalam – Kerala, Oriya – Orissa, Tamil – Madras (Tamil Nadu), Telugu – Andhra.
The SRC rejected demands for a separate Jharkhand state for lack of popular support in all the affected districts. It also rejected demands for a Punjabi Subah on grounds of disguised communalism. The SRC could not insist that fifty percent of all centrally recruited civil servants posted in a given state be non-residents, but it refused to recommend that recruitment to state civil services be restricted to sons of the soil.
After agitations in both Gujarati speaking and Marathi speaking areas, the State of Bombay was divided between Gujarat and Maharashtra in 1960. And after a change in leadership in the Akali Dal, its demand for a separate Punjabi speaking state was also conceded in 1966.
Despite the apparent political
turbulence associated with the reorganization of states, the SRC
recommendations and their implementation prove the genius of the Nehru era in
managing centrifugal forces through democratic solutions and pluralistic
compromises.
Monday, 25 May 2020
ILLITERACY
Saturday, 13 August 2022
FOUNDATION COURSE I NOTES
Click on the topics you want to learn / read more about
Module I
Overview of Indian Society
Appreciate the concept of linguistic diversity in relation to the Indian situation;
Understand regional variations according to rural, urban and tribal characteristics;
Understand the concept of diversity as difference.
Module II
Concept of Disparity 1
Understand the concept of disparity as arising out of stratification and inequality;
Explore the disparities arising out of gender with special reference to violence against women, female foeticide (declining sex ratio) and portrayal of women in media.
Appreciate the inequalities faced by people with disabilities - vision impairment, hearing impairment, socially handicapped, and understand the issues of people with physical and mental disabilities.
Module III
Concept of Disparity II
Examine inequalities manifested due to the caste system and intergroup conflicts arising thereof;
Understand intergroup conflicts arising out of communalism.
Examine the causes and effects of conflicts arising out of regionalism and linguistic differences
Module IV
The Indian Constitution
Philosophy of the Constitution as set out in the Preamble,
The structure of the Constitution: Preamble, Main Body and Schedules, Fundamental Duties of the Indian citizen, Tolerance, peace and communal harmony as crucial values in strengthening the social fabric of Indian society
Basic features of Indian Constitution
Module V
Significant aspects of Political Processes