APPRAISAL OF LPG POLICIES (ECONOMIC REFORMS)
Liberalization, Privatization and Globalization
created mixed reactions
Arguments in favor of Economic reforms
Increase in rate of economic growth – the growth of
GDP increased during the reform period
Foreign exchange reserves increased along with inflow
of foreign investments
Inflation was under control
The role of the private sector increased. The
abolition of the licensing system and removal of restrictions on entry of the
private sector earlier reserved for the public sector have enlarged the area of
operation of the private sector.
CRITICISM OF ECONOMIC REFORMS
Neglect of agriculture – public investment in
agricultural sector especially in infrastructure which includes irrigation,
power, roads, market linkages and research were reduced in the reform period.
Removal of the fertilizer subsidy increased the cost
of production which adversely affected the small and marginal farmers.
After the commencement of WTO a number of policy
changes were made like reduction in import duties on agricultural products,
removal of minimum support price and lifting of quantitative restriction on
agricultural products.
Due to export oriented policy strategies in
agriculture the production shifted from good grains to cash corps for the
export market. It led to the rise in prices of food grains.
Growing unemployment – in the public sector, on the
plea of overstaffing and redundancy and in the private sector on the plea of
modernization and technical upgradation, workers were gradually being
retrenched or forced to accept voluntary retirement.
Low level of industrial growth
Cheaper imported goods replaced the demand for
domestic goods and domestic manufacturers started facing competition from
imports.
Lack of infrastructure facilities including power
supply due to lack of investment
Non tariff barrier by developed countries – all quota
restrictions on exports of textiles and clothing have been removed from India,
but some developed countries like USA have nor removed their quota restrictions
on import of textiles from India.
Ineffective disinvestment policy – under this policy,
there has been a substantial loss to the government as assets of the public
sector undertakings have been undervalued and sold to the private sector. Moreover,
the proceeds from disinvestment were used to compensate the shortage of
government revenues rather than using it for the development of PSUs.
Ineffective tax policy – the tax reduction in the
reform period was done to generate large revenue and to curb tax evasion. But
it did not result in increase in tax revenue for the government.
Spread of consumerism – the new policy has been encouraging
a dangerous trend of consumerism by encouraging the production of luxurious
items of superior consumption.
Unbalanced growth – growth has been concentrated only
in some select areas in the services sector such as telecommunications,
information technology, finance, entertainment, travel and hospitality
services, real estate and trade rather than vital sectors such as agriculture
and industry, which provide livelihood to millions of people in the country.
No comments:
Post a Comment