Showing posts with label Sociology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sociology. Show all posts

Thursday, 28 July 2022

MA Sociology Part I (Sem II) Notes Paper III Contemporary Perspectives in Cultural Anthropology

Click on the topic you want to learn / know about: 


CONTEMPORARY PERSPECTIVES IN CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY


Unit I: Cultural Materialism and Marxism

• Neo-evolutionism

• Cultural Ecology

• Cultural Materialism

• Marxist Anthropology


Unit II: The Interpretive Turn

• Symbolic and Interpretive Anthropology

- Concepts and Terms

• Thick Description, Liminality and Communitas

• Theorizing the Nation State, Ethnicities

• Multiculturalism

- Culture

- Interpretive Approach


Unit III: Reflexivity, Feminism and the Subaltern

• Fieldwork and Reflexivity

• Critique of Classical Ethnographies

• Feminism and Anthropology

- Feminist Anthropologists India

- Feminist Anthropologists International

• The Subaltern Turn


Unit IV: Post-Modern Locations

• Post-Structuralism

• Post-colonialism

• Globalization: Hybridity, Flows, Boundaries

• Cultural Studies

Tuesday, 7 June 2022

MA Sociology Part I Notes (Sem II) Paper I Contemporary Social Theories

Click on the topic you want to learn / know more about:


Contemporary Social Theories

 Unit I: Structural Functionalism and Micro Sociology

• Structural Functionalism and Conflict Theories

- Functionalism

- Herbert Spencer

- Emile Durkhiem

- Robert Merton

- Malinowski

- Radcliff Brown

- Talcott Parsons

- Conflict Theory

- Classical Theorist - Conflict Theory

- Conflict Schools of the Modern Era

- Elite Theory - Conflict Theory

- Current trends in Conflict Theory

• Symbolic Interactionism

- Criticisms of Symbolic Interactionism

- George Herbert Mead

- Blumer and the Chicago School

- Geoffman & Dramaturgical Perspective

• Ethnomethodology, Garfinkle & Ethnomethodological Enquiry

- Conversational Analysis

- Ethnomethodologists and Mainstream Sociology

• Narrative Analysis


Unit II: The Critical and Postmodern Turn

• Western Marxism

• Critical Theory

- Ideas of Jurgen Habermas

• The Frankfurt School

• Post-structuralist and Postmodern theories


Unit III: Theorizing Structure, Network and Risk

• Theories of Structuration

• Habitus and Practice

• Theories of Networks

• Risks and Liquidity


Unit IV: Plural Registers

• Post-colonial critique

• Standpoint Theories and Beyond

• The Feminist Critique

• Sociology from Below: Dalit Sociological Perspectives

- The Book View and the Field View

- Major Trends of Social Transformation

Friday, 8 April 2022

Culture Shock & its Relevance in Media

“Culture shock” describes the impact of moving from a familiar culture to one which is unfamiliar. It is an experience described by people who have travelled abroad to work, live or study; it can be felt to a certain extent even when abroad on holiday. It can affect anyone. It includes the shock of a new environment, meeting lots of new people and learning the ways of a different country.

It also includes the shock of being separated from the important people in your life, maybe family, friends, colleagues, teachers: people you would normally talk to at times of uncertainty, people who give you support and guidance.

When familiar sights, sounds, smells or tastes are no longer there you can miss them very much. If you are tired and jet-lagged when you arrive small things can be upsetting and out of all proportion to their real significance.

Culture shock can take place when people move from rural to urban areas and are exposed to different cultural practices, not just from one country to another.

Let us now look at culture shock and its relevance in Media

Mass communication influences both society and culture. Different societies have different media systems, and the way they are set up by law influences how the society works. Different forms of communication, including messages in the mass media, give shape and structure to society.

Individuals and groups in society influence what mass media organizations produce through their creativity on the input side and their consumption habits on the output side.

Many mass media products transcend social structures to influence multiple societies, and even in societies that heavily censor their mass media the news of scandals and corruption can get out. The mass media and society are bound together and shape each other

With the rise of global computer networks, particularly high-speed broadband and mobile communication technologies, individuals gained the ability to publish their own work and to comment on mass media messages more easily than ever before. If mass communication in the 20th century was best characterized as a one-to-many system where publishers and broadcasters reached waiting audiences, the mass media made possible by digital information networks in the twenty-first have taken on a many-to-many format.

For example, YouTube has millions of producers who themselves are also consumers. None of the social media giants such as Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, Qzone and Weibo (in China), Twitter, Reddit or Pinterest is primarily known for producing content. Instead, they provide platforms for users to submit their own content and to share what mass media news and entertainment companies produce. The result is that the process of deciding what people should be interested in is much more decentralized in the digital network mass media environment than it was in the days of an analog one-to-many mass media system.

The process of making meaning in society — that is, the process of telling many smaller stories that add up to a narrative shared by mass audiences — is now much more collaborative than it was in the 20th century because more people are consuming news in networked platforms than through the channels managed by gatekeepers. A mass media gatekeeper is someone, professional or not, who decides what information to share with mass audiences and what information to leave out.

 

On social media platforms, media consumers have the ability to add their input and criticism, and this is an important function for users. Not only do we have a say as audience members in the content we would like to see, read and hear, but we also have an important role to play in society as voting citizens holding their elected officials accountable.

If social media platforms were only filled with mass media content, individual user comments, and their own homegrown content, digitally networked communication would be complex enough, but there are other forces at work. Rogue individuals, hacker networks and botnets — computers programmed to create false social media accounts, websites and other digital properties — can contribute content alongside messages produced by professionals and legitimate online community members. False presences on social media channels can amplify hate and misinformation and can stoke animosity between groups in a hyper-partisan media age.

Around the world, societies have democratized mass communication, but in many ways, agreeing on a shared narrative or even a shared list of facts is more difficult than ever. Users create filter bubbles for themselves where they mostly hear the voices and information that they want to hear. This has the potential to create opposing worldviews where users with different viewpoints not only have differing opinions, but they also have in mind completely different sets of facts creating different images about what is happening in the world and how society should operate.

The world of mass media has witnessed the convergence of media content on digital platforms, the ability of individuals to engage in one-to-many communication as though they were major broadcasters, and the emergence of structures that allow for many-to-many communication. 

Thus we see that with the wide variety of information available on the internet, the masses are exposed to varied cultural practices and are thus exposed to cultures that are different and unique from their own. It becomes easier to accept and understand the variety of cultures as we are now exposed to them via social media / mass media.

In conclusion, it is important to stress that culture shock is entirely normal, usually unavoidable and not a sign that you have made a mistake or that you won’t manage. In fact there are very positive aspects of culture shock. The experience can be a significant learning experience, making you more aware of aspects of your own culture as well as the new culture you have entered. It will give you valuable skills that will serve you in many ways now and in the future.

 

Ref: https://press.rebus.community/mscy/chapter/chapter-1/#:~:text=Mass%20communication%20influences%20both%20society,shape%20and%20structure%20to%20society.

 

 

 


Wednesday, 6 April 2022

COMMODIFICATION OF CULTURE

Media and culture share a relationship which is both positive and negative. Certain negative effects of media on culture are impact on violence, racial stereotypes, economic exploitation, and mindless consumption of commodities. 

On the other hand, media has helped in providing education opportunities, creating awareness about different and unique cultures, etc

One of the most intriguing and challenging perspectives emerging from critical cultural studies is the commodification of culture – the study of what happens when culture is mass produced and distributed in direct competition with locally based cultures.

Media are industries specializing in the producing and distribution of cultural commodities. As with other modern industries, they have also grown at the expense of small, local producers and the consequences of this displacement have been, and continue to be, disruptive to people’s life.

Some important consequences of lifting bits of everyday life culture out of their context, repackaging and then marketing them back to the people:

·        When elements of everyday culture are selected for repackaging, only a very limited range is chosen and thus important elements are overlooked or are consciously ignored.

·        The repackaging process involves dramatization of these elements of culture which have been selected.

·        The marketing of cultural commodities is done in a way which maximizes the likelihood that they will successfully intrude into and ultimately disrupt everyday life.

·        The elites who operate the cultural industries generally are ignorant of the consequences of their work.

·        Disruption of everyday life takes many forms – some are obviously linked to consumption of especially deleterious (negative impact)  content, but other forms of disruption are very subtle and occur over long periods of time.

In modern capitalist societies, ‘commodification’ points to the relationship between large economic systems and hegemonic cultural ideologies and is mainly concerned with generating profit rather than enriching human feelings or experience. Commodification of culture has had an intense impact on the lifestyle of people.

Critical cultural studies researchers have directed their most devasting criticism towards advertising which is viewed as the ultimate cultural commodity.

Thursday, 24 March 2022

MA Sociology Part I Notes: Paper I Classical Sociological Theory

 

Paper I Classical Sociological Theory

 

Click on the topic you want to learn / study


Unit I: Karl Marx in the context of Western Modernity

Philosophical Ideas: Human Nature, Human Potential and the Place of 'Work',

Alienation, Historical Method

 Economic Concept: Critique of Capitalism, 

Labour Theory of Value , 

Fetishism of Commodities ,

 Class and Division of Labour

 Political Ideas: MaterialistOrigins of state, Historical stages of the state, The state and civil society

 Legacy of Marx/Marx Today


Unit II: Emile Durkheim in the context of Western Modernity

• Methodological Contributions: The legacy of Comtean Positivism, Society as

sui generis, Characteristics of a Social fact, Observation of social facts, Rules of

Sociological Method o The Division of Labour:Definition of Division of labour,

• Study of anomie and suicide, shift from psychological to sociological explanations,,

social Integration and suicide, forms of Suicide,

• Theory of Religion , Sacred and profane,, Elementary Forms of religious life,

the totem, Civil Religion

• Legacy of Durkheim/Durkheim today


Unit III: Max Weber in the context of Western Modernity

• Methodological Contributions: Theory of knowledge in the social sciences,

Natural Science vs. social science debate, Verstehen, the Ideal Type

• Theory of Social Action:rationalisation, bureaucratisation, The Iron Cage,

disenchantment, action and rationality, interpretive theory of Social action, four

types of social action 

o Dialogue with Marx:Religion and the economy, Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of capitalism, the case of Calvinism, Capitalism in China and India

• Legacy of Weber/Weber Today


Unit IV: George Simmel in the context ofWestern Modernity

Georg Simmel Dialectical Thinking

• Three levels of Social Reality: psychological components, Social components

and cultural/historical components, Fashion

• Individual consciousness, Forms and types of Social interaction, Study of Social

Structure and objective culture- Case study of secrecy.

• The Philosophy of Money: Money and value, Reification and rationalisation,

Tragedy of Culture

• Legacy of Simmel/Simmel Today

Sunday, 13 March 2022

MA Sociology Part I Notes Paper II Competing Perspectives on Indian Society

 

Paper II Competing Perspective on Indian Society

 

Click on the topic you want to learn / study


Unit I: Introduction-brief overview of Sociology in India

• Schools of Sociology in India with special focus on the Bombay “School”

https://youtu.be/OmrvVpypfO8

https://youtu.be/6iavCopNkkU


• Approaches: Indological, Civilizational, Historical and Field-work


• ‘Indianizing’ and ‘Indigenizing’Sociology

https://youtu.be/UJcTdZzwmsg

https://youtu.be/BC2n8jJqOm4

https://youtu.be/RFtQJcjgqrY

 

• Non-Brahmin Perspectives on Indian Society 

 

Unit II: Theorizing Caste

• Ambedkar’s theorizing of Caste and the‘Caste Question’ 

• Dumontian and Post-Dumontianapproaches to theorizing Caste


• Gender and Caste (Gail Omvedt, Leela Dubeand Sharmila Rege)

• Caste Today: Power, Hierarchy, Difference and Identity (works of Beteille, D.

Gupta and Ilaiah) 

 

Unit III: Constructing the Nation and Nationalism

• Nation as spiritual and Political (ParthaChatterjee) 

• Critique of the “Project Homogenization” (TK Oommen)

• Nationalism sans Nation (G Aloysius) 

• Women and Nationalist Discourse (Victim, Mata and Sevika) (Tanika Sarkar

and others) 

 

Unit IV: Critical Perspectives on complex Social Transformation: Globalization

and Indian society

• Social Consequences of changing State-Market relations: Education, health,

Employment 

• Traditional Hierarchies in Globalizing Society: Multiple, Intersecting and complex

Marginalities

• Economic Transformations and Tribal Communities: Marginalization, claims and

struggles

• Identity Politics: Region, religion, class as contexts of homogenized and

fragmented identities. 

Monday, 31 May 2021

SOCIAL CHANGE

Meaning and definition of social change: Change is an ever-present phenomenon. It is an integral part of nature and of man. All societies are subject to change, the physical environment, people, and culture all undergo changes. Society is not static but dynamic.

To Mac Iver and Page, social change refers to the changing pattern of social relations, social structure, of groups and organizations. It is defined as the changes in the structure and functioning of a particular social system. Identifying change involves showing how far the structure of an institution or society or community is altered over a period of time. a given social system is in a process of change when its basic institution is modified, when the roles which individuals constituting the system change when functions change, when status is based on achievement, etc.

Social change mainly refers to changes in the life patterns of people. Changes in art, science, technology, philosophy, may result in the changes in the attitudes, behavior, social processes, social patterns, interactions and relations of people. These changes then amount to social change.

Factors responsible for social change: Social change is the product of the interaction of many factors. A single factor may trigger a particular change, but it is always associated with a number of factors. The physical, biological, technological, cultural, and other factors may together being about social change. None of these factors works separately form the rest. Each factor is therefore an element in the system. Changes in one part influence the other parts, until the entire society or community is involved. The following are the factors that are responsible for change.

Physical environment – has an effect on the development of human social organization, for e.g., in extreme environmental conditions people must reorganize their ways of life in relation to weather conditions. People who live in Alaska follow different patterns of social life from people in Mediterranean countries. Major changes in the environment are quite reare but very compelling when they occur. For e.g., when there is a famine or when soil is eroded or when coal or oil in a particular region is exhausted etc., people have to move away or man’s original activity changes. Human beings however can adapt to their environment. They can master the world around them. Man does not accept the limitations imposed by his natural environment; he strives in various ways to change it. He can change the courses of rivers and turn deserts into fertile areas. Each new invention, each improvement of man can lead to change in society.

Population factors – Changes in the size, density, sex-age composition of population have an important impact on social change. A rapidly growing population must either migrate or improve in productive techniques. For e.g., population explosion in a developing country like India has led to many socio-economic problems including crime and violence. Great historical migrations and conquests of the Vikings, Huns, etc., have arisen from the pressure of a growing population upon limited resources. Migration encourages further change for it brings a group into a new environment, subjects it to new contacts and confronts it with new problems. Population changes have occurred all through human history, by reason of migration, war, changing mores, famines, etc. Those societies were declining death rate have a higher standard of living, high status of women, high levels of literacy, etc. A population change therefore is not only a change in itself, but also becomes a causal factor in further social and cultural changes.

Economic factors – influence the rate and kind of change. Industrial capitalism is one of the most important economic factors that have had a far-reaching impact on the society. It not only aims at technological innovations and increasing productivity but also maximizes profits at the cost of labor welfare. This results in conflicts between the rich and the poor. Economic inequality has become a common feature where there is deprivation of every kind. There is no equality of status, rather, a glaring disparity between the rich and the poor, leaving the country with no savings or capital investments. Our cultural interest are often affected by economy. For eg. Those interested in fine arts, dance, music, theatre, etc., as a career cannot take them for want of enough resources or economic support. However, economic factors alone cannot be the cause of social change.

Political factors – Another type of influence on social change is the impact of political developments. The struggle between nations to expand their power, develop their wealth and military over other nature has been an important source of change over the last few decades. The government as political machinery can either enhance change or disrupt and retard it. The political ideology, the policies and programs and efficiency with which they run the country tends to influence the process of social change. For e.g., political instability in India has adversely affected economic growth. NRIs and other foreign investors dread investing their money in projects or industries in India. Terrorism and religious fundamentalism have caused havoc in India. India has suffered from these politically oriented movements which have resulted in riots and conflicts. Thus, political factors can ruin a generation, affect social change, the socio-cultural and socio-economic life of the people.

Isolation and contact – Societies located at world crossroads have always centers of change. Since most traits come through diffusion, those societies in closest contact with other societies are likely to change most rapidly. Areas of greatest intercultural contact are always the centers of change. Trade, even war has always brought intercultural contact and today tourism is adding to the contacts between cultures. Conversely isolated areas are less likely to change. The most primitive tribes have been those who were the most isolated like the polar eskimos or the Onges of the Nicobar Islands. Isolation invariably retards change.

Attitudes and Values – Societies differ greatly in their general attitude towards change. A society that reveres the past, worships ancestors, are preoccupied with traditions, superstitions, and rituals will change very slowly and unwillingly. Literate and educated people tend to have positive attitudes and values towards change and hence accept changes more readily than illiterate and uneducated people do. A rapidly changing society therefore has a different attitude towards change and this attitude is both cause and effect of the change already taking place.

Perceived needs – A society’s rate and direction of change are greatly affected by the needs its members perceive. ‘Needs’ are subjective, they are real only if people feel they are real. Until people feel a need, they resist change. For e.g., the tire was invented in 1845 but was ignored until the popularity of the bicycle created an awareness of the need for tires. A more recent failure is the need to recognize that death control creates the need for birth control as well as the population will increase tremendously.

The cultural base – By cultural base we mean the accumulation of knowledge and technique available. As the cultural base grows, an increasing number of inventions, innovations and discoveries are possible. Unless the cultural base provides the necessary knowledge and technique available to the inventor, innovations cannot take place. For e.g. Leonardo da Vinci sketched many machines which were entirely workable in principle, but the technology of his day were incapable of building them.

Processes of social change

When we refer to social change as a process we mean that it is a definite step by step manner by which change takes place and where one state leads and merges into another. A process means a continuous change taking place in a definite manner through the operation of forces present from the very beginning with the situation. Examples of processes is communication, integration, socialization, inventions, diffusion, discovery, innovations, etc.

Discovery – A discovery is a shared perception of reality, which already exists. It is an addition to the world’s store of already existing knowledge. It adds something new to the culture because although this reality may have always existed, it became part of the culture only after its discovery. For e.g., human beings discovered continents, circulation of blood, the different planets, comets, etc. A discovery becomes a factor in social change only when it is put to use. For e.g., before AD 100 Hero of Alexandria had build a steam engine as a toy, but steam power produced no social changes until it was put to serious use years later. Therefore, when new knowledge is used to develop new technology, cast changes generally follow.

Invention – An invention is often defined as a new combination or a new use of existing knowledge. The wheel did not exist until someone had the idea of using a round slice of tree log and length of tree limb, or round stone. Thus, even though the elements used are not new, it is the idea of combining them in a useful way that produces something that never existed before. For e.g., iron, with the addition of small amounts of other metals, became steel, a new metal altogether. Inventions may be classified into material inventions such as bow and arrow, telephone and so on and social inventions such as the alphabet, law, etc. Each invention may be new in form, function and meaning. Form refers to the shape or trait of the new invention; function refers to what the invention does and meaning the long range consequence of its use. For e.g.  the hooka, bedi and cigarette are different in form, but not in function or meaning.

Innovation – The term innovation usually includes both discoveries and inventions. In either case something new has been added to the culture. Innovations are usually compatible with being the existing culture. Usually traits are modified to fit into the existing culture of the society. Example – A new speech form – Hinglish – new dance step, etc. A society with a good cultural base that provides for the accumulation of science, technology will have more innovations.

Diffusion – Most of the social changes in society have developed through diffusion, the spread of cultural traits from group to group. Diffusion operates both within societies and between societies. Jazz originated among the black musicians of New Orleans and today it has been diffused throughout the world. Diffusion takes place whenever societies come into contact. A typical American wears pajamas invented in India, uses coins invented in Lydia, eats waffles invented in Scandinavia and smokes (an American India habit) a cigarette, derived from Mexico. The process of diffusion therefore is an important instrument of social change. Most of the aid-programs in underdeveloped countries and underprivileged groups within countries are efforts to promote diffusion.

 

Planned social change – The direction and spread of change are often conditioned by human engineering. Planned social change referred to a conscious and systematic planning, projects, programs, etc., launched by man to determine and control the rate and development of change. For e.g., fiver year plans, Family Welfare Programs, Economic policies and so on. Planned social change is desirable as the various goals to be achieved the means to achieve them are outlined before. India has adopted planning programs after independence to bring about overall development particularly in the villages. For e.g., irrigation projects, credit societies, etc. Similarity, in the urban areas town planners seek to introduce various projects and constructive changes to make life in cities more bearable. For e.g., building flyovers, highways, controlling air and water pollution, reducing noise pollution, etc., Planning is also necessary to combat the problems that could arise of unplanned changes. Unplanned changes refer to changes resulting from natural calamities, wars, etc. Therefore, planning change is a necessary feature of modern societies in order to achieve overall progress.

 

Resistance to and acceptance of social change

Specific attitudes and values – Aside from its general attitude towards change, each society has many specific attitudes and values. Peoples establishes likes and dislikes are important factors in social change. If an object or trait has a purely utilitarian value – i.e., if it is a valued because of what it will do, or how it will benefit people – change may be accepted quite readily.

Demonstrability of innovations – An innovation is most quickly accepted when its usefulness can be easily demonstrated. The American Indians very eagerly accepted the European guns and pistols, as it was more useful than the bow and arrow. The people in the urban areas readily accepted the pressure cooker, washing machine, and various other household appliances. Sometimes inventions are inefficient in their earlier stages that the general acceptance is delayed until they are perfected. For e.g., the recent innovations of the solar operated autorickshaws or cars are not readily accepted. Social inventions however can be tested only through long term trial.

Compatibility with existing culture – Innovations are most readily accepted when they fit in nicely with the existing culture. If the innovation conflicts with the existing culture, it may be rejected, or it may be modified to fit into it. Many tribal areas have readily accepted the procedures and materials of scientific medicine – antibiotics, vaccinations, etc., and have continued to use their traditional folk medicine. Today American movies, sport, fashion, etc. have been readily accepted in Indian society, but with necessary modifications.

Technical difficulties and costs of change – Change is almost always costly. Not only does it disrupt the existing culture and destroy cherished sentiments and values, but it also involves some specific costs. The very poor resist change because they cannot afford to take any risks. Technology not only costs materially but also brings about difficulties if the culture is not modified enough to accept new change.

Role of the change agent – who proposes a change how does this person go about it? The identity of the originator greatly affects acceptance or resistance of change. Innovations, which are first adopted by persons at the top of the social ladder, are likely to filter downward quite rapidly. Many change agents are deviants of some sort. The non-conformists may launch a new fashion, speech form, or dance step, which may be readily accepted among people.

Thursday, 27 May 2021

GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE THIRD WORLD SOCIETIES

Third World Societies: From the 17th century to the early 20th century the western countries established colonies in many areas previously occupied by tradition societies using their military strength wherever necessary. Although these colonies have now attained independence the process of colonialism has shaped the social and cultural map of the glove. In some regions like North America, Australia and New Zealand which were only thinly populated by hunting and gathering communities, Europeans became the majority population. Societies of the first of these types such as the US have become industrialized. Other example are many countries of Europe like France, Germany, England, and parts of Asia e.g., Japan. Those in the second category are mostly at a much lower level of industrial development and are referred to as third world societies which include China, India, African Countries like Nigeria, Ghana, Algeria and those in South America, Brazil, Peru and Venezuela.

Level of Industrialization in the third world countries: The third world countries have a basic level of industrialization and majority of population is engaged in agricultural production. Since many of these societies are situated to the South of USA and Europe, they are sometimes referred as South (South Block) and contrasted to the nations of the north. The TWC are very different from pre-form, pre-existing forms of traditional state. They have political system which is derived from the first societies which established in the west. Most of the population still live in the rural areas but are highly affected by the process of urbanizations. Although agriculture is the primary occupation, crops are often produced for sale to the world markets rather than for local consumption. TWC do not consist of societies that have ‘lagged behind’ but have societies that are industrialized. TWC is usually understood as part of the contrast drawn between the three main types of societies which were found in the 13th century. The FWC were industrialized states like Australia, New Zealand, Japan. FWC have a multiparty system and parliamentary system of government. Second World countries which refer to former communist societies, USSR, Eastern Europe, Poland, Hungary and Czechoslovakia. The term third world refers to ‘Developing countries’ or ‘less developed countries’ by comparison with the industrialized nations. The third world societies are mostly very poor. Many of them have experienced the massive rate of population growth which places extreme strain on their resources as a result of which these countries generally have a very low standard of living.

The various conditions within the third world countries:

Economic conditions: The distribution of income and the average level of per-capita income in the developing counties is very low. There are several barriers which exist in raising the living standards of the poor. The barriers that exist are:

Dualistic nature of economies i.e., Modern and traditional economies

Disguised unemployment

Underemployment

Open unemployment

Nutrition and health: Low income has led to serious consequences in the field of nutrition and health of individuals. In the developing countries it is estimated that there are at least one billion people who suffer from malnutrition and a number of mental diseases.

Poverty and famine: Vast sections of population in the TWC face a shortage of food and experience famine conditions, not because the food has become scarce but because they are not proper entitled to have food. Entitlement to food depends on the ability of the individual to exchange productive resources (goods) for food. The need in TWC is to alleviated famine conditions. This requires the establishment and preservation of wealth and resources entitled to food and not just provision of more food.

Food production level: TWC have dual economies i.e., modern and traditional economies. The technology which is used in food production is also of different types. The developing countries have simple technology as well as modern sophisticated type of technology. Against this background food production in the developing countries has barely kept pace with the population growth i.e., the population in the developing countries rises at an alarming rate. Lack of adequate food supply and nutrition combined with rudimentary health facilities leads to low life expectancy and a high rate of infant and child mortality.

Education: There has been an enormous growth in public expenditure on education in the developing countries. However, it is shocking to know that the expenditure per-capita is only half of that in the developed countries.

Basic needs: include provisions of health services, education, housing, sanitation and adequate nutrition. All these are severely lacking int eh developing counties while there is a major improvement in the literacy rate in most countries over the last few decades, the absolute number of illiterate have increased. In the developing countries, secondary education as well as higher education is still a luxury as people cannot afford the high education fees that are to be paid.

In conclusion we can say that the developing countries lag behind severely with respect to highly developed countries and it is easy to note that the developing countries will hardly ever ‘catch up’ with the highly developed countries.