Explain the role of sea-faring groups in the structure of Indian Maritime trade.
Seafaring and employment on ships was a specialization that
appears to have been well provided in the 17th century. The commercial
and shipbuilding areas also produced a large body of people who were suitable for
employment on ships.
Gujarat produced some of the best ship hands in this period
due to which it was easy to recruit crews to man ships (to provide workers on
ships) from several maritime communities of Kathiawar and North Gujarat. These cam
from several Hindu caste groups whose occupation was seafaring and working on
ships as well as Muslims, perhaps converted, were employed on ships.
To the south, in Konkan, there were several maritime groups
who were professional mariners among Hindus and Muslims. Portuguese recognized their
expertise and recruited many of their ship crews from them – they were called
as Canarims.
In both Malabar and Kanara, the age-old tradition of maritime
activity had produced a variety of groups of coastal people living off the sea.
They came from several Hindu fishing and seafaring as well as from domiciled
Muslim communities.
The Mapillas were a community of seafarers who provided the
manpower for numerous ships and small vessels as well as the militia on board these
vessels.
The entire East Coast from the Southern tip to Orissa was
replete (full of) with seafaring castes, mostly Hindu. There was also strong
Tamil or Chulia Muslim community of the far south which produced expert seamen.
The demand for specialist manpower increased. The Portuguese had begun
recruiting specialized people on ships from Konkan, Kanara and Malabar.
The merchants who live by overseas trade and resides at a
port does not necessarily ever go to sea himself. A sea trader does not have to
be a sea traveler, a sailor or a navigator.
Most of the ships were owned by the Hindus and Muslims. They
were usually shore-based. Sometimes, the owner was also the captain or Nakhoda
of the ship. The Nakhoda was not the actual navigator who was called the Sarang.
He was usually a private individual on the Red Sea Route, on the pilgrim ships,
he was a Mughal official and mansabdar. Most of the trade was done by nakhodas
on behalf of their shore-based owners of the ships.
Shipping in the Indian ocean in the fourteenth and fifteenth
centuries was dominated by Muslims from Bengal and Gujarati Muslims controlled
practically all the ships of the Malabar coast. Hindu traders, particularly
Gujarati Vanias and Coromandel Tamils were also involved in the trade.
The Portuguese recognized the skill of Indian pilots and in
1541, they hired two Indian pilots who knew sailing conditions in the Red Sea. The
Gujaratis were also better seamen and did more navigating than the other people
of these parts, they had larger ships and more men. The Portuguese also used Arab
and Kanarese sailors.
In the south, most of the ships were operated from Malabar.
Those controlled by the Kunjalis, Marakkars were crewed by the Kunjali’s fellow
Moplas.
Other groups of lower castes were widely used in South West
Indian waters as common sailors. These groups were often fishermen and sailors by
hereditary occupation and were close to the bottom of the Malabar Hindu
hierarchy. These seafaring castes included Mukkuvars, Tivars, Mogers and
Pulayars.
The demand for specialist manpower increased in the second
half of the seventeenth century with eh increase in Indian shipping and
recruitment by Europeans. The Portuguese had been recruiting in the Konkan,
Kanara and Malabar. The crew of an Indian vessel had to be versatile in their abilities.
Evidence of the eighteenth century on recruitment to vessels owned by South Indian
Chulia Muslims shows that they engaged in cost saving measures. The Lascars
they employed worked as artisans and laborers when the ship was in port and unless
so employed, they were not paid wages. The crew doubled up as carpenters,
caulkers, riggers, etc. Also, each Lascar appears to have been allowed to take
a small venture with him. Thus, this chulia practice was community oriented and
patron-client relationship would have operated at sea as they did on land.
The commercial activities of the seventeenth century
expanded the opportunities for employment. Specialized mariners and seafarers
were in great demand to man the large number of ships. Skilled craftsmen were
also in great demand to serve the increasing building activity in port towns. These
was also similar demand for unskilled labor.
In the initial period of the Maratha power in the Deccan
and Konkan region, trade and commerce through waters was not encouraged and
permits were issued ot other powers to trade through waters. Shivaji, the founder
of the Maratha rule and Peshwa Madhavrao I sent ships every year to the ports
of Arabia and Persia. Peshwa Madhavrao I tried to improve maritime trade due to
which the coastal communities got encouragement and there developed the Bhandaris,
Dalits, Sonkolis, gabits, Bhois and Kharvis s the main seafaring castes in
Konkan. They supplied crew for the Maratha navy. All these castes were well
trained for seamanship. The sea was in tehri veins. The Bhandaris supplied the
nimble crew as they were experts in climbing the tall palms. The Kolis and
Bhandaris were a daring people. Their knowledge of seafaring and fishing was
handed down from father to son. The fisheries were the training schools for seamanship.
They possessed practical knowledge required for sea voyages – the geography of the
surrounding coast, the sunken reefs (rocks), the shallow banks and other points
of danger. The sailor in general was an illiterate fellow. Even today most of
the seafaring classes are illiterate.
The Hindu seafaring classes were more conservative in
character than their Muslim counterparts. They were quite satisfied in venturing
in their own coast and normally did not venture a voyage to the countries beyond
their own seas. They never enquired about the country of the white man
(Topikar) who came to their coast form beyond the seven seas.
The Muslim sailors – the Daldis and the Kharvis of Gujarat
on the other hand were more enterprising and ready to quit home whenever better
remuneration was available. Many of them were employed as gunners in the navy. They
have always exhibited a keener aptitude for sea trade than the Hindus.
The sources tell us little about how many Hindus from the central
West Coast of India travelled by sea. A letter of 1598 refers to vanias, native
of Gujarat, trading in their own ships to Chaul, Goa and Cochin.
In the later sixteenth century the main coastal trade for
Vanias was that from Gulf of Cambay to Goa, carried in convoys (protecting force)
under the protection of the Portuguese warships. For these seafaring Vanias, trade
was not the only reason for sea travel. They travel for various reasons. The crew
of the Gujarati ships were probably Navayat Muslims.
There were also other Gujarati Hindus apart from vanias who
travelled by sea. In the early nineteenth century, the goldsmiths, lapidaris
and other workmen, occupied with the finer crafts were all banias and Brahmins
of Cambay and were found living in Goa. In 1634, the brahmin natives of Gujarat
living in Goa and Diu, petitioned the Portuguese authorities and other brahmin
caste that freely travel across the seas to collect payments from Kachh vania
traders in Mozambique and Arabia were Saraswat brahmins.
There are evidences of Vanias residing in Middle Eastern
ports. They must have travelled and settled there and in old age they must have
returned back home. The Vanias were also trading in Persia and settled in
Baghdad. There are also examples of Vanias or Hindus residing in Hurmuz from
1400 AD to seventeenth century. These Vanias had their own captains during
Portuguese times.
Vanias also settled all along the Hadramant Coast and within
the Red Sea. They were found at Masua, Suakin on the Ethiopian shore and at Aden,
Mocha, and Jeddah. It is clear that these Vanias prospered despite occasional harassment
from the authorities.
Thus, Hindus of many different castes including brahmins
travelled by sea in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.
No comments:
Post a Comment