What is history? Explain its scope.
Subject matter of History – The scope of a subject means
the number of matter or things covered for a satisfactory knowledge of a chosen
subject. Usually for any subject that we study the purpose is clearly defined. Thus,
in various disciplines, university or boards of education determine the syllabus.
This is a routine program for studying a subject. We cannot limit our alteration
to educational practice alone. We must specify topics for discussion and have
to allow discussion on matters related to the specified topics also. At higher
levels we must consider the spectrum of views on that matter. The scope of the subject
under study is not determined arbitrarily. History is a social science and like
all social sciences research is being carried out. More and more areas of knowledge
are being added. They in turn stimulate further inquiry. It would be
instructive to look at history in this perspective.
Subject matter of history as envisaged by historians and philosophers
of history is of a complex character. Historians want to reconstruct the past
and put it in a form of a story. Philosophers of history want to detect the hidden
plan behind the course of History. Now historians and philosophers cannot be segregated,
we therefore have to take a comprehensive view of the subject matter of history
that is the scope of history.
Main feature of the scope of history
The scope of historical study depends upon the subject
matter of inquiry of the past events.
The scope of history is determined by the activities, experiences,
and thoughts of men at different times in the past.
The scope depends upon the nature of inquiry of the past
such as social, economic, political or other kinds of inquiry. Thus, if we want
to know a single aspect of the Quit India Movement of 1942 say economic aspect,
its scope is narrower than a general assessment of the movement from different
angles.
If we intend to study universal history of the progress of mankind,
it is greater in extent than a local or a national history.
Similarly, when we think about world history, the time factor
makes it necessary to define what exactly we want to study. If we simply say
human activities it would mean a never ending search as human activities from the
beginning to our days implies scope beyond our human capacities.
Just as the present has innumerable matters for consideration,
the past which for some generations in the past was a living present and as
such they dealt with many known and unknown matters. The scope of our study in
general matters would be both impossible and end in a cloud. We have therefore
to fix our attention on some points.
Limitations of the scope
When we say history is a study of man’s activities in time,
the scope of our inquiry is limited by the time factor. If we do not fix the
time of what happened in the past it would be a fantasy. The scope of history
is limited by our knowledge of chronological details. Man appeared on this
planet several million years ago but the recorded history of his activities cannot
be pushed back beyond five thousand years. Those records do not give us a clear
idea of his activities in civilized societies.
Human activities – History in the real sense of the term
began when the Greek Statesman – Warrior Herodotus wrote about Greco Persian
War in the fifth century BC. This was the first history of its kind in the world
and the beginning of ‘history’ is thus reckoned from that time. the scope of history
of the world is thus limited to the history of mans social activities to a few
thousand years. The activities of men before the historical period, that is before
fifth century BC is enveloped in the mist of ignorance.
Geographical factor – When we talk about world history, we
actually refer to few places on the earth. As everybody knows more than half
the surface of the earth is covered by water. Out of the remaining part a
sizable surface is occupied by hills, deserts, mountains and rivers, ice, etc.
Thus, the habitable portion of the earth is limited. Further, mans
civilizations grew in a few favorable lands. The scope of history is thus
limited.
Time factor – The scope of history cannot be rigidly fixed
at any time. suppose today we say history covers life of man and his activities
in civilized societies, a few years later on centuries after our time, historians
would say history is concerned with activities and experiences of men and women
only in highly developed societies or they may say it is confined only to the societies
which are now developing.
Prevailing conception of history – Just as the scope of history
is limited by time, it is limited by the prevailing conception of history at a
given time. in communist countries, the conception of history is different from
those of democratic countries or countries under despotic rule. Thus, scope of historical
inquiry responds to the necessity of knowing the truth about certain people at
certain time.
Stages in the Expansion of Historical Vision
Herodotus ‘the father of Secular History’ wrote his account
of the Greco-Persian War and provided very useful information of contemporary Greece.
His book started writing of history in the Western world. His purpose in
writing the narrative was to see that glorious deeds of the heroes of the war
were not forgotten by the subsequent generations. The scope of history outlined
by him was the heroic deeds of Greek warriors. The subsequent Greek and Roman
writers slightly modified the pattern.
Livy, the Roman historian of the first century BC. Wrote the
history of rome with a wider view of describing the lives of men who lived in the
Roman Empire. The scope of history was thus expanded.
The noteworthy feature of Greco-Roman histories was the humanistic
approach that the writers adopted. This was abandoned in the early medieval
period under the influence of Christian theology.
The scope of history during the Middle Ages was undefined
as the writers believed that man’s activities were directed by Divine Providence.
The Christian doctrines however promoted periodization of history and also a
universal approach. Renaissance of the fifteenth century once again brought man
at the center of the world. The period of the Enlightenment limited the scope
of history only to the recent past which they regarded as a period of rational
activity. The Romanticists expanded their vision and began the study of the past
ages.
The scope of history from the eighteenth century under the
inspiration from Rousseau’s ‘Social Contract’ made great strides int eh production
of historical literature. The researchers of the nineteenth century and the ambitious
projects of the Annales and Subaltern historians have included many matters
coved by other social sciences and total history of men. H. G. Wells ‘Outline
of World History’ (1920) started the movement and Will Durant wrote about world
civilizations.
Scope of Historical Methods and Limitations
The main task of a historian is to show what man is, as is revealed
through the evidence of his activities and experiences in the past. He depends
upon the surviving evidence of the past as it was. The first problem that determines
the scope of this inquiry is the relics and traces of the past in some form or
the other. Man’s written records of his activities and experiences are of
recent origin but the unwritten records of the past represented by artifacts
and folklore are incalculable. Our only sources of information are written
records and archaeological remains. The methods of history thus have to be adjusted
according to the availability of these sources which would lead to an adequate
knowledge of the events.
The scope of historical knowledge is expanded by new forms
of evidence or by new ways of utilizing the old sources. The main sources of information
of the past ages were limited to texts and chronicles. The decoding of the Harappan
script or such other hitherto unknown picture symbols of ancient records may
throw much light on the unknown history of the most ancient civilization of Africa,
Asia and South America.
A new way of looking at old literature in oral or written
forms also expands our vision of history. Hindu Mythology was looked upon by educated
as childish fantasies. They were examined by Pargiter and Winternitz and they
showed that a true picture of real social life of the ancient Indian people
could be reconstructed from the indirect and unintentional narratives of those
myths.
Limitation on the method are many. Historical knowledge is
an indirect and inferential knowledge from the fragments of surviving evidence.
The famous libraries of Nalanda University and the Chinese libraries in Beijing
and other places were destroyed by vandals. Some of the secret documents were either
seized by the conquerors or disappeared mysteriously. There are political and other
considerations which suppress the truth which cannot be discovered at least at
present. However, new techniques to squeeze truth out of the available sources
or new discoveries will expand the vision of history.
New Science and New History
The eighteenth century station philosopher, G. B. Vico, was
the first thinker of his time who widened the scope of history and claimed
validity for historical knowledge. He dismissed Rene Descartes view that historical
knowledge was not possible. The past is dead and gone, how could one reconstruct
it as it actually was? Vicos reasoning was that ‘Man can know what man has done’
and on this basis has knowledge of the past and would be valid if he possesses
the facts of the past. From his principle of ‘Venum Factom’ (knowledge of thing
made by the maker) he maintained that, the systems of language, customs, laws, government
and other institutions that is though of history represent the genesis and
development of human societies and their institutions. He showed how the science
of language i.e., philosophy, could help not only to reconstruct the history of
the past but also provide means of verification of the facts narrated orally or
in writing. He wanted to instill a strict discipline in collection and interpretation
of documents and make history an autonomous science a ‘New Science’.
Vico expanded the vision of history and ensured the validity
of the narrative by an intelligent and imaginative use of language, customs,
laws, and institutions of the time under study. The twentieth century thinkers
Marc Bloch and Fernand Braudel put forward the concept of ‘New History’. This expanded
the scope in every respect. They painted out that there exists at all times, elements
which are not ‘conscious’ or visible in the social development and this is known
as unconscious history. Historians have to look beyond the events that are ‘conscious’
or appear on the surface. A mass of unknown and formless elements like climate of
opinion influence the thoughts and activities of man. These elements have to be
understood. The historical situation is full of such unconscious or unseen
elements and they spring on the surface or on the conscious suddenly. For e.g.,
the unrest among workers or peasants breaks out unexpectedly at times. The scope
of new history is to know the total history of man. In the twentieth century another
view of history that is the subaltern view adds one more dimension. It is the
study of masses of people who are of little or no consequence in business, political
and intellectual fields.